Very clear now! Thank you very much. -Xiantao OTC,Intel Corporation > -----Original Message----- > From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 2006年7月27日 17:36 > To: Zhang, Xiantao; Aron Griffis; Juan Quintela > Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx; Chris Wright; > fedora-ia64-list@xxxxxxxxxx; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Akio > Takebe > Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [PATCH 0 of 5] > fixlinux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64 > > Hi, Xiantao > > Yes, you are right. > And I think you must use the following patch. > > Now I cannot boot by using xen-ia64-unstable > (not linux-2.6-xen-fedora) on FC6. > I'm debuging it. > Then I'll try to boot by using xen-ia64-unstable/xen and linux-2.6-xen- > fedora. > > diff -r 61b945565398 drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h Wed Jul 26 17:22:38 2006 +0200 > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h Wed Aug 02 00:30:00 2006 +0900 > @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static inline void tpm_write_index(int b > > static inline u32 get_chip_buffersize(struct tpm_chip *chip) > { > - return chip->vendor->buffersize; > + return chip->vendor.buffersize; > } > > extern void tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *); > > Best Regards, > > Akio Takebe > > >Hi Akio, > > Thank you for your information. I am using the CSet34705 which should > be > >latest, and do you mean I should apply Aron's patches on it. right? In > >addition, what's status about it? > >BTW, > > > >Thanks & Best Regards > >-Xiantao > > > >OTC,Intel Corporation > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >> Sent: 2006年7月27日 16:47 > >> To: Zhang, Xiantao; Aron Griffis; Juan Quintela > >> Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx; Chris Wright; > >> fedora-ia64-list@xxxxxxxxxx; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [PATCH 0 of 5] > >> fixlinux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64 > >> > >> Hi, Xiantao > >> > >> BZ's patch is old. > >> Today 139 cset is added to linux-2.6-xen-fedora tree. > >> So I think we should use Aron's patches. > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> > >> Akio Takebe > >> > >> >Hi Aron, > >> > Could you share me the current status for fedora-xen-ia64? Through your > > >> > >> >mails, I see we should focus our efforts on linux-2.6-xen-fedora. But when > >> >I applied the patch 199684 on it, conflicts occurs. Do you have any > >> >suggestion for contributing to Fedora ? > >> >Thanks & Best Regards > >> >-Xiantao > >> > > >> >OTC,Intel Corporation > >> > > >> >> -----Original Message----- > >> >> From: fedora-xen-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > >> [mailto:fedora-xen-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] > >> >> On Behalf Of Aron Griffis > >> >> Sent: 2006ト・ヤツ27ネユ 12:11 > >> >> To: Juan Quintela > >> >> Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx; Chris Wright; > >> >> fedora-ia64-list@xxxxxxxxxx; Alex Williamson; > >> >> xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> Subject: [PATCH 0 of 5] fix linux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64 > >> >> > >> >> Hi Juan, > >> >> > >> >> These patches are the result of Akio, Prarit, Alex and me working on > >> >> fixing > >> >> the > >> >> ia64 build of your tree. At this point the bare-metal Linux kernel > >> >> builds and > >> >> boots. The xen kernel builds but doesn't complete booting. > >> >> Nonetheless, > >> >> since > >> >> these patches seem to take us most of the way there, we'd like to > >> >> request > >> >> them > >> >> to be applied to your tree. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Aron > >> > > >> >_______________________________________________ > >> >Xen-ia64-devel mailing list > >> >Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel -- Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
