On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 00:28 +0900, Akio Takebe wrote: > Hi, Aron and Prarit > > Thank you for your explanation. > I confused bacause there are some tree. > > But I'm clear now. Thanks again. > I'll work on http://hg.et.redhat.com/kernel/linux-2.6-xen-fedora > by using BZ 199684 patch. > > I have two other question. > Where from is the above tree? xen-unstable? xen-ia64-unstble? It comes from linux-2.6-xen (this follows xen-unstable with 1-2 days lag), and linux-2.6 (plain linus 2.6 tree). It gets updated daily. Actual changesets are: [quintela@anano linux-2.6]$ hg tip changeset: 33089:93feac10afde [quintela@anano linux-2.6-xen]$ hg tip -v changeset: 22749:d195197a6bed14f372d4526917d4476a30f299d6 xen-unstable changeset: 10731:77ec02027c17714124935612f1b3cb52fec3f436 > And which cset is the above tree base on? It don't have any ia64 specific bits still. I received a mail from you (i.e. Aiko) with two patches and anther from Prarit telling me to wait before I apply the patches. I am having a _big_ execshield problem on x86, once that is finished (I hope Thrusday/Friday) I will take a look at compiling the tree on ia64 box (already got access to one box, thanks Prarit). Later, Juan. -- Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
