Re: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Fedora-ia64-list] Re: Four ways RH could helpwith xen-ia64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 00:28 +0900, Akio Takebe wrote:
> Hi, Aron and Prarit
> 
> Thank you for your explanation.
> I confused bacause there are some tree.
> 
> But I'm clear now. Thanks again.
> I'll work on http://hg.et.redhat.com/kernel/linux-2.6-xen-fedora
> by using BZ 199684 patch.
> 
> I have two other question.
> Where from is the above tree? xen-unstable? xen-ia64-unstble?

It comes from linux-2.6-xen (this follows xen-unstable with 1-2 days
lag), and linux-2.6 (plain linus 2.6 tree).  It gets updated daily.
Actual changesets are:

[quintela@anano linux-2.6]$ hg tip
changeset:   33089:93feac10afde

[quintela@anano linux-2.6-xen]$ hg tip -v
changeset:   22749:d195197a6bed14f372d4526917d4476a30f299d6

xen-unstable changeset: 10731:77ec02027c17714124935612f1b3cb52fec3f436

> And which cset is the above tree base on?

It don't have any ia64 specific bits still.  I received a mail from you
(i.e. Aiko) with two patches and anther from Prarit telling me to wait
before I apply the patches.

I am having a _big_ execshield problem on x86, once that is finished (I
hope Thrusday/Friday) I will take a look at compiling the tree on ia64
box (already got access to one box, thanks Prarit).

Later, Juan.




--

Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General]     [Fedora Music]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Directory]     [PAM]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux