On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 16:52 -0400, James Morris wrote: > Jeremy wrote: > > As we move forward with Xen enablement, there's a desire for > > being able to access more than 4 gigs of RAM on 32-bit Xen hosts. The > > options for handling this are > > 1) Another kernel. This is bad due to > > a) we're running out of CD space already > > b) keeping things matched up between the HV and the guest kernels > > c) migration is worlds of pain with two types of kernels > > What about leaving the non-pae kernel out of the core distro and > distributing it online only via extras? You have to have it in the base set because the installation tree has to include PAE install bits if you're going to support PAE hosts. HV + dom0 kernel + domU kernel have to match here. Ignoring that, you're saying that you want to maintain a second kernel package in sync with security errata? It's insanity. Also, it will break down a lot in terms of allowing kernel module packages, etc. Jeremy
