On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > I know there's a bit of a backlog of proposed criteria changes I really > should look at, but wanted to write this one down before it escapes. Per > the thread 'Syslog not running?', I'd like to propose the following > Alpha criterion for future releases: > > * A system logging infrastructure must be available, enabled by default, > and must work as intended, and in accordance with relevant standards > accepted by the Project > > (Improvements to the wording welcome, I'm trying to keep it from going > stale by not specifying particular logger implementations or file > locations) ACK! :) My usual concerns about encompassing too much ... should we elaborate on "working as intended"? Clearly we are interested in whether it works in the most basic sense ... not if remote logging a select set of messages to another system fails (or is that included too)? Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
