Apr 8, 2011 12:03:05 PM, test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >The reason this is a fallacy is that you haven't established that the >level of OpenGL support is the *only* difference between the >configurations in question, and it certainly isn't. There are all sorts >of others. As Ajax says, it's likely not to do with the exact level of >OpenGL support available, it's more likely just a bug in the problematic >hardware / driver combo. >-- >Adam Williamson This hardware appears to be a write-off for Gnome3 now (see the comment by Owen Taylor at the BZ below), but I'll still point out something interesting I saw on my other ATI. I happen to have an RV200, which I tried with F15BetaRC1, and while it was generally unusable for many reasons, the fonts were not corrupted as they are with RV250/280. So, I think that may support the idea of there just being a bug in the R200 implementation. OpenGL vendor string: Tungsten Graphics, Inc. OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R100 (RV200 5157) 20090101 TCL DRI2 OpenGL version string: 1.3 Mesa 7.11-devel https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647158 -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
