On 04/05/2011 07:11 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 04/05/2011 04:33 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >> On 04/05/2011 08:15 AM, JB wrote: > >> >> No you are actually wrong here Gnome design and any other *DE or spin >> design flaws or praises should be mentioned on their relevant list >> within the project or upstream where all the relevant developers reside >> which can either answer your question(s) and or take note of what you say. >> >> Adam ( or anyone else for that matter ) should not have to play >> messenger and collect feedback to pass to them when you or anyone else >> for that matter can pass your concern directly to them yourself. >> > > Seems reasonable .. that said: > > It would be appropriate to discuss here which DE fedora should using > ... and in so doing comparative benefits and drawbacks to help decide. > Fedora is not (I assume wedded to gnome - its goal is to be the best ... > so if Gnome 3 does not come up to snuff and we have a better alternative > - we should consider a switch. > > [JB gnome 2 is dead - so please stop asking for it here .. its not an > option - fedora follows gnome - and the current version is 3 or will be > soon - if you have a beef with 2 versus 3, adam and johann are righ - > take it to gnome dev] > > So if someone has constructive suggestions of an alternative to Gnome > 3 - that should be fair game ... > > But you'd be targetting F16 at this stage of the game ... I would imagine. > > gene/ > > I'm really happy now with Gnome 3 and Avant Window Navigator. It turns out to be quite a lot like OS/X. -- -- Steve -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
