On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 14:07 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > If you have a moment, and spare hardware/guest, please add karma > > > feedback to: > > > * > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/anaconda-15.26-1.fc15 > > > * > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/filesystem-2.4.40-1.fc15 > > > * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/systemd-23-1.fc15 > > > > Note that disabling SELinux via config file with just the above > > updates > > is going to fail and cause the system to be unbootable, due to > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692573 . To fix that you > > also need an updated libselinux, once the build succeeds. > > I'm confused. Are you talking about using jlaska's boot.iso or about people updating their existing installation? > > My experience with jlaska's boot.iso: > 1. The installation proceeds fine. +1 for anaconda seems appropriate > 2. The system won't boot without selinux=0. > 3. With selinux=0 the system boots, but firstboot crashes on last page ("send hardware profile") and thus restarts on every boot. Looks like we'll need a bug against firstboot. Is there a firstboot traceback file in /tmp ? > Is that +1 or -1 karma for aforementioned updates? I'm also trying to understand where things are the with the SELinux issues. Does installing selinux-policy-3.9.16-12.fc15 make a difference? Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
