On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 16:23 -0400, Andrew Ross wrote: > > > Sorry ,I am not clear about the necessity of import result form > > > another test run,is it mean those test run very similar, so why make > > > a > > > new run?Do you explain some more detail about this feature's > > > scenario ? > > > > > > > Okay, take F15 Alpha candidate for example. When RC1 is available, its > > test run is created for testing, if it has some blocker bugs which > > don't > > meet release criteria, RC2 with the fixes would be posted for testing. > > A > > new test run would be created and the test cases are the same as RC1 > > run. But for some cases that we assume the fixes won't affect, on > > wiki, > > we moved their RC1 results which are supposed to be unchanged directly > > to the RC2 run, see the example pages[!]. This way, for RC2 run, we > > have > > both new tested and moved results, and the cases are intact for each > > run. > > > > > > [!] > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_15_Alpha_RC1_Install > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_15_Alpha_RC2_Install > > > > Hi Hurry, > > In this use case are you assuming that there would be no regression bugs between RC1 and RC2? For the test cases with moved results, I'm assuming there would be no regression bugs. But since it's community testing, these tests in each new run(eg RC2) are still open for testing to encourage contributions to cover this area. > Cheers, > > Andrew Thanks, Hurry -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
