On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 11:28 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 02/15/2011 10:40 AM, Felix Miata wrote: > > On 2011/02/15 08:36 (GMT-0500) James Laska composed: > > > >> Good-bye install.img, hello initrd.img! > > > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Features/UnifiedInitrd > > > >> The installer no longer needs to locate where install.img is (network, > >> DVD, HD). The content previously included in the stage#2 install.img > >> file, is now included in the initrd.img. > > > > And goodbye to my to my customary installation method of loading installation > > kernel and initrd from my many little 200M /boot partitions that don't have > > room for being made larger. Good thing the two files needn't be located the > > same place, but it makes keeping track of where they are more complex. I > > guess I can use home's root or give home's root an install dir, and put even > > kernel there too. Or, maybe on my user/local partition. Or, on a FAT or NTFS > > partition?!?!? > > Hm, yeah, this is going to break koan as well, isn't it for systems with small > /boot filesystems. I could be wrong, but I don't think koan was initially designed with a focus on small /boot scenarios. Given it just downloads the vmlinuz +initrd.img, it certainly lends well to that scenario. However, any tool that's downloading vmlinuz+initrd.img to prep a system for install will be impacted by any file system layout for '/' or '/boot'. I suspect we'll have several additional tools that need adjustment to handle any /boot (or /) size restrictions. Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
