On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 07:47 +0000, "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" wrote: > On 02/15/2011 07:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Not really. There are cards from all three major vendors which are > > broken, and cards which work. It's not really unexpected, we just need > > to make sure bugs are filed for all the broken ones. > > If you are aware of several cards that are broken from three major > vendors than perhaps *hint* *hint* you should setup a wiki page which > contains a list of all known broken cards with corresponding bug reports > so.. No. I don't want to do that. It would be an ugly, manual (and therefore broken) way to do it. What I'd want to do is just set up a tracker bug for cases of GNOME Shell being borked on cards where we'd expect it to work, and probably another for cases of fallback failing on cards where we don't expect GNOME Shell to work. > Perhaps we might also want to create a tracker bug for each of those > major vendors... Yes, but I don't think it's really necessary to split by vendor. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
