----- Original Message ----- > On 02/07/2011 10:29 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Well, for desktop validation it is clear that fallback mode creates > > quite different environment from gnome-shell. For installation > > testing > > it is true that mostly we test anaconda, but a lot of our test cases > > contains a requirement "System boots successfully". Can we assume > > that > > booting into fallback mode successfully in KVM satisfies that > > requirement? That's one of the questions for the proposed topic. > > For any Gnome related test days you cant use KVM since one of the > information we need to gather from test days for developers is that if > users are getting either a shell or fallback mode or not and those > reporters that aren't getting shell or fallback mode will need to file > a > bug providing their smolt profile so developers can look deeper into > what hw is failing to reach shell or fallback mode. > > To put it short for desktop validation testing for the Gnome Desktop > Enviroment booting into fallback mode successfully in KVM does not > satisfies that requirement ( but it still needs to work and tested > accordingly ) but for desktop validation testing regarding any other > of > the DE booting it does > > However I think that "System boots successfully" only means that you > can > successfully reach what ever *DM ( GDM KDM LXDM etc ) or booting to > specific runlevel works as in 1 3 5 etc. > > Do you have a link to the specific test case(s) you are referring to > I'm > curious to see how they have been written. E.g.: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceDvd https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_autopart_install -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
