On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 19:02 +0000, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: > > I do like litmus! It's a nice evolution from testopia for > upstream > > mozilla. We don't currently have an 'unclear' test result. > I'm not > > opposed to it, but would need better understand how that > field is used, > > and the process around it, in litmus. > > > Agree with James. > > What I believe Mozilla is doing (since I have not had a chance to work > with their QA team yet) is flagging test cases with a form of soft > failure in that the result of a testcase neither clearly passed, nor > clearly failed. So in addition to "Passed", "Failed", and any other > common states (Blocked, In Progress, etc.) you have an "Unclear" > result state. Hurry is somewhat wrong to say we don't currently have an 'unclear' result; we do have the 'warn' result, which is in some ways similar. We usually use it to indicate when a test turns up some kind of anomalous behaviour which isn't exactly a failure. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
