On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 18:14 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 21:59 +0000, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 21:03 +0000, Andre Robatino wrote: > > > When running "yum --skip-broken update" and getting this message (currently in > > > Rawhide), should it always be considered a bug and reported? > > > > Depends what you mean. If you mean 'is it a bug in yum', no. There are > > some types of dependency issues that can't really sensibly be resolved > > by ignoring some updates. It's clearly a bug in *something*, though. You > > should treat each case individually, figure out what the ultimate root > > of the problem is, and file a bug against the appropriate package. > > well some of them are a bug in yum. :) And, in theory, yes we should be > able to walk it back. right, my answer was 'no it's not *always* a bug in yum', not 'no it's never a bug in yum'. sorry if that wasn't clear =) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
