2011/1/3 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson": > Now under normal circumstances Matthew Garret or some other kernel > maintainer would have asked you to add to your report, the output from > acpidump but given that this has been incorrectly triaged and marked as a > duplicated of bug 50837 which was filed against F11 our kernel maintainers > probably wont take a look at it. > > I would have expected the kernel team to have opted themselves out of triage > process or at least be extremly selective on the individuals triaging the > kernel since it requires a bit more skill set than running around changing > bug status-is and copy/paste predefined responses to the report but since > it's not the case, I'm forced to direct you directly upstream to the kernel > bugzilla ( https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ ) which is something usually dont > recommend since our bugzilla should be sufficient for our reporters and it > requires reporters to be educated in the art of kernel patching and > compiling since upstream oftern request reporters to recompile with patch > and provide feedback back. Bug 666649 has not been marked a duplicate of whatsoever. Moreover it's active since its status is "NEW" and not "CLOSED". ~C -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
