On 29/11/10 19:08, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 12:40 -0500, James Laska wrote: > Things that some people see as problematic are: > > * Having to wait a week to push an update if you can't find testing > * Testing being required for packages with automated test suites > * The delay to security updates which is introduced by the testing > requirements Testing would get much easier, if packagers could provide some test cases. The packager could send mail to -devel or -testing to get some testers. > >>> * allow packages with a %check section to go direct to stable. >> I think this is a bad idea. Just insert a null- %check section (package gets a +1 from provenpackager, add a (pseudo-anonymous) +1 vote and voila: package goes directly to stable. Testing is costly, in each case. Seems like testing gets suppressed this way. Matthias -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
