On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:40:25 -0500, James wrote: > > * updates that only modify the spec could have a lower requirement. > > (ie, to fix a packaging issue, no changes in the upstream software). > > All %obsoletes, %requires, %provides, %files and %patch statements are > only recorded in the .spec file. Just because they are in the .spec > file doesn't mean they are any less disruptive. True, but (1) it is considerably easier for a project like autoqa to catch bad deps/conflicts/obsoletes than (2) to catch software bugs introduced in a version upgrade. Plus (3) you don't want to do baby-sitting for packagers who are expected to know what they're doing wrt packaging. > > Non critpath/security: > > > > * reduce timeout for non critpath from 7 to 3 days. > > > > * change default autokarma to 2 or 1. > > No immediate thoughts on these points. Bodhi ought to make it impossible that the update submitter spends +1 on her own update. It has been abused already. And there ought to be an _enforced_ minimum number of days in updates-testing for certain packages. They need time to be picked up by the mirror-system. And testers need more time to become aware of new test updates and then spend additional time on evalulating the updates. It is completely useless if some testers _skip_ or shorten the updates-testing period by giving +1 for koji builds or within 24 hours. That is what has happened for a "mesa" update that hasn't seen sufficient testing due to the short time it was offered as a test-update: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mesa-7.9-1.fc14 -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
