On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 07:29:23 -0500, John wrote: > > Second thought before I'm afk: If you meant to say that sda6 is an > > encrypted PV (which builds VG dubby), do you get the same problem for > > lv_home? And what does dumpe2fs say about the LV's filesystems? > > > > > [root@localhost ~]# dumpe2fs /dev/sda6 > dumpe2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) > dumpe2fs: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/sda6 > Couldn't find valid filesystem superblock That's expected, if sda6 is encrypted actually and VG vg_dubby is built out of the encrypted PV (and the fs is found only on the LVs). That doesn't answer the questions, however. What I wondered is what dumpe2fs output you get for lv_home and lv_root? Since according to the quotes in your original post, LVM was able to construct the VG and the LVs after you had opened the underlying LUKS device (sda6 aka "crypt1"). It wouldn't be able to do so, if opening and creating the crypt1 mapper device failed. Intersting case though. ;) > /dev/sda6 is the encrypted PV. It holds VG_dubby. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
