On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 18:30 -0400, Luke Macken wrote: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:10:37PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 20:44 +0000, updates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > The following Fedora 12 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: > > [snip 59 critpath updates] > > > Okay, this obviously sucks, and I'm really worried we cannot > > realistically impose the critpath policy on F12 when we clearly don't > > have the testing capability at present. We've discussed various things > > to do about this; for now I propose we remove the critpath restrictions > > on F12. From a *theoretical* point of view this makes no sense as we > > should treat all stable releases the same, but from a *practical* point > > of view, I can't see another way to handle the situation. > > Okay, so it's not *as* bad as it seems. Due to a bug in the query that > is used to generate this list, obsolete updates are included as well. > I ran a fixed query for F12, and there are only 20 unapproved critpath > updates, as opposed to 59. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/critpath?release=F12&unapproved=True > > Even though it is not as bad as it appears, it is still obvious that we > lack the testing resources to properly enforce our current critical path > policies for older stable releases. Especially since four of the fixes are security fixes. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
