On 10/28/2010 02:56 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 07:08:01PM +0530, Saurabh Sharma wrote: >> Hello List, >> >> i was trying to install Samba under my newly installed F14 using YUM, but the >> listed packages were having discripancy. The samba package was x86_64 and all >> of the other dependencies were i686. Accepting to download/install the packages >> , YUM threw error which clearly shows that some of the packages were of x86_64 >> arch and i see no good in removing the latest packages and installing the older >> ones and that also of different arch. > Using F14 errm RC?, the latest, I think... > > rpm qa |grep samba shows > > samba-winbind-clients-3.5.5-68.fc14.1.x86_64 > samba-3.5.5-68.fc14.1.x86_64 > samba-winbind-3.5.5-68.fc14.1.x86_64 > samba-common-3.5.5-68.fc14.1.x86_64 > > So it seems as if they're all x86_64 binaries. > > For what it's worth, I did a minimal installation, added openbox > afterwards, but I don't see why that would change anything. > > I did a freshly Fedora Gnome desktop live install off the latest RC and it came with samba-winbind-clients-3.5.5-68.fc14.1.i686 When I did yum install samba-* all samba packages and related dependency offered to me were i688 arch. Since I'm unable to duplicate it looks like you have installed some other package that was x84_64 and may have required samba which then would pull in the relevant samba x86_64 packages? Does the yum history/log share some light on this matter? The installation log might also contain useful info. JBG -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
