On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 12:13 +0800, Qiang Li wrote: > > On 10/25/2010 12:57 PM, Qiang Li wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > >> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:14 +0800, Qiang Li wrote: > > >> 1) Direct Rawhide install via standalone Anaconda > > >> 2) Direct Rawhide install via Live installer > > >> 3) Yum update from a test release > > >> 4) Yum update from previous release > > >> > > >> I prefer the first two methods. > > > > > > I don't like updating from a test release or previous release, > > because > > > it takes too much time, bandwidth and it's hard to solve broken > > > dependency. > > > > > > What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide? > > > > > > Qiang > > > > > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 13:21 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > I just want to say that I too miss the ability to do #1. > > Why not try to regain the ability? :) Let's work together to see if it > is possible. This is partly a question of whether Rawhide *should* be an installable release. For me, one way of answering that would be to ask the installation developers whether they intend (and are able) to actively support/maintain an installable rawhide in addition to the active Branched release (Fedora 14). For test, I'd much prefer focusing our energy on ensuring the Branched release meets the Fedora release criteria. Part of which includes using different package repos during installation. Using the branched release installation images to install a rawhide package set is a perfectly valid way to install rawhide packages. Thanks, james
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
