Re: Comparing other distros kernels to Fedora.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 01:09:18PM +0200, Micha? Piotrowski wrote:
> It might be a patch added by one of Fedora kernel developers. CC'ing
> fedora-kernel
>

Honestly, there's nothing particularly relevant in F-14's kernel. Can
you please try:
http://kyle.fedorapeople.org/kernel/2.6.36-0.36.rc7.git3.fc15/x86_64/

Which is a nodebug rawhide kernel, which is even closer to upstream than
the F-14 2.6.35 is, and let us know if that's any more helpful?

(I could swear someone was doing pre-built vanilla kernels, we should
bring that back if not.)

I've tried this kernel (sans perf) and I can suspend and resume again.  This is in f14.

Should I try this in f13?

Will this help isolate what's wrong with the 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 kernels for my system?

I should ask, are there other fedora testers using a Dell Studio XPS 1547?


R.
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux