On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 11:07 -0400, James Laska wrote: > > All of them. They're mostly modifications of existing pages. I'm not > > quite sure how you get that they look the same, they're very different. > > General note ... There are a few broken links on this page. I didn't > inspect *all* of them, but it looks like they will resolve once you've > moved the documents into their proposed locations. So probably not a > big deal, I can understand the desire to not change the links before and > after moving the pages into their final location. Yeah, they'll work after the pages are all put live. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/QA:SOP_nth_process_nth_draft is a proposed new page which covers the whole nice-to-have review process much as the above proposed page covers the blocker review process. > > My first reaction looking at the proposed blocker and nth process SOP > pages was that they should be combined into a single page, since there > is a lot of duplicate document structure/format. But I can't think of > any good proposals to offer at the moment that make it better (not > worse). It seems you've already been down this route too. Yeah, I went back and forth. If you make them one page some of the phrasing gets very long and clunky and possibly hard to parse, I was happier with it as two pages. > Perhaps a reflection on my visual learning habit, I've been playing > around with some minor edits of the 2 previous wiki pages that make it a > bit easier for me to rapidly locate/grok information without too much > reading. Of course, let me know if the edits are too invasive or > detract from your intended message. Thanks, I'll revert them all later ;) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
