James Laska writes: > Andre correctly reminded me that 'ssh' installer support is not intended > as a replacement for a telnet install. Rather, it is a means for > enabling 'ssh' to remotely monitor install progress. Translation, you > can ssh into the installing system and monitor /tmp/*log or do whatever > else you want from a shell. Essentially, it provides the shell you > normally get on tty2, but over the network. > So, what's the new way to install on a remote machine where one has no hands-on access? What do those of us with machines at dataplexes like The Planet, or with virtual machines on services like Virtual Host do? To my mind ssh would be a perfect replacement for telnet for all the obvious security reasons. If, however, the answer is vnc, then I'm compelled to point out that leaves some of us out of the party. Janina > Thanks, > James > -- > test mailing list > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Chair, Open Accessibility janina@xxxxxxxx Linux Foundation http://a11y.org Chair, Protocols & Formats Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/wai/pf World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
