On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 19:24 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote: > On 26/09/10 17:41, He Rui wrote: > >>> > >>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627789 > >>> > > > > That's ok. It will be helpful if /var/log/anaconda.log is not deleted.:) > > I have lodged this: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637495 > > I have attached to it what I saw looked to be the required logs. > > > Therefore users are encouraged to provide their results on the pages to > > increase the coverage. I'm also curious about your installation method > > and wanna reproduce it. > > The system is an Asus EeePC 1005P. Installation was with a USB DVD drive > - as these don't have DVD drives built in. Then your bug is likely a dupe of 627789. Please, don't say you're installing from a DVD when you're not. :) Installing from DVD is indeed a basic requirement that is tested many times before a release is validated. Installing from the DVD image written to a USB stick is not the same thing at all and is not such a basic requirement. If you give the wrong impression about how you're installing, it's likely to lead to confusion. I would like to have a clear story from anaconda or whoever on what exactly is supported in terms of writing the DVD image to USB, and what isn't. I've never been particularly clear on that point. It would be good to clear it up and add some specific install validation tests for it - Hurry, do you agree? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
