On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > Is it really necessary to include entire package change logs in the > rpm changelog? What is wrong with referencing either the included > changelog or a URL to a changelog that people can go and reference. I > remember this being discussed ages ago but I'm not sure if there was a > packaging policy instigated. > There wasn't -- in general I don't like to pursue really stylistic stuff like this as a guideline. If you'd like to push a draft, though, the FPC will consider it. Rather than a guideline, Andrew, would you just consider summarising the important changes for the rpm changelog from now on? Thanks, -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpbfFTnmCApQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
