On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:31:43 +0000, JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson wrote: > > I'm a bit curios on why so many of you choose to use VirtualBox instead > of the Virtual Machine Manager. > > Do you think that Virtual Machine Manager is to hard and to complicated > to use? > > Are there any specific features that Virtual Box has which Virtual > Machine Manager does not? > VirtualBox does not need full hardware virtualization, still has more polished desktop integration, works cross platform, is mostly open- source ... and now supports running OS X (albeit Server) as guest. I tend to run both VBox and KVM, depending on what the situation requires. KVM tends to be much better at running BSD guests, for instance. I've never really used VBox-OSE though -- the VBox build from upstream, which has the proprietary bits, is easier to use; it came with the source files for the kernel module, and thus you can adjust to a new kernel with a simple init.d command. -- Michel Alexandre Salim Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/ Email: salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | GPG key ID: 78884778 Jabber: hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | IRC: hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
