JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson <johannbg <at> gmail.com> writes: > On 09/22/2010 08:01 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 09:21 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > > > >> It seems it would be better to open a Rpmfusion BZ > > Right. This isn't a Fedora package. > > > > (The problem is that it hasn't been rebuilt against Python 2.7, BTW. I > > imagine there's some kind of problem with this, or it would probably > > have happened already.) > > The recommended procedure when testing virtual images is to use the > virtual solution(s) we ship. > > I'm a bit curios on why so many of you choose to use VirtualBox instead > of the Virtual Machine Manager. > > Do you think that Virtual Machine Manager is to hard and to complicated > to use? > > Are there any specific features that Virtual Box has which Virtual > Machine Manager does not? VirtualBox seems much more polished. For me, compared to VirtualBox, KVM guests are sluggish (I have AMD-V enabled in the BIOS), sound doesn't work (I haven't checked if there's an existing bug), and there doesn't seem to be anything corresponding to VB's guest additions, so I can't copy and paste between the host and the guest (which is aggravating when the guest is so slow but I have to bring up a browser in it when using fedora-easy-karma). Unfortunately, VirtualBox usually doesn't work for test releases (14 and Rawhide), so I use VirtualBox for 12 and 13, and virt-manager for 14 and Rawhide. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
