On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:16:56 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 21:50 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: >> threshold after which we could assume that the packager *and* testers >> know what they're doing, and approve the update without testing the >> affected functionality? > > We may have to look at something like this if this situation keeps > happening. Another thing I mean to do is to patch fedora-easy-karma to allow people to blacklist packages from their update list. Too many people voting 0 and just say "not tested" right now. Adam, any idea whether this is a good idea or not? On one hand we want people to say "hey, I install this update and my machine still boots" because that's at least (slightly) informative. But I wonder how many testers we lose by the tedium of seeing the same package over and over again (and yet the packages come with the base system and are rather tedious to remove -- X drivers, RAID utilities and so on) -- Michel Alexandre Salim Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/ Email: salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | GPG key ID: 78884778 Jabber: hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | IRC: hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
