On 09/16/2010 09:09 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: > On 09/16/2010 08:58 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> >> Then let Yum handle it instead of asking explicitly for i686 or x86_64. > > Thats where I started last week .. and this was an attempt to see if > I could get further. > > . what is broken here ? rpm, yum or the >>> packages ? >> >> What's strange here is that the EVRs of your i686 and x86_64 packages >> don't match. They are built from the same src.rpm and published at once, >> so why your i686 packages are newer, no idea. I've never encountered that >> before on a multi-arch x86_64 installation, so I can't comment on >> it. Perhaps you've somehow managed to arrive at that state by asking Yum >> explicitly for i686 updates when actually you needed both, i686 and >> x86_64. > > I dont see a nss-tools.i686 for version > 3.12.7-2 perhaps that is a problem ? > > > gene/ > I hand installed nss-tools.i686 using rpm (as yum could not find it for some reason) and now eveything updates ... was one further yum check warning during the update .. thanks for help -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
