On 09/16/2010 09:39 AM, Dennis J. wrote: > On 09/16/2010 12:23 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >> Lennart may very well choose to delay systemd until F16 since the window >> of opportunity of having the necessary community resources dedicated to >> systemd has passed . > Wow. In one moment systemd is ready to be included as a critical component > shortly before a release and in the next it is in such bad shape that it > needs to be worked on for a whole year before it can get included? > If what you say is really the case than I guess it was actually a good > decision to not use systemd in Fedora 14. > > ? Systemd is in good shape actually better than some other stuff we have shipped. It got rejected because apparently it lacks documentation ( which was being looked at ) and hypothetical bugs scenario ( which you cant deal with until you actually encounter the bugs ). So I dont see what you are getting at in this response. Next development cycle ( F15 ) most resource will most likely be dedicated to Gnome3. It's a question about how smart it is to ship and introduce both systemd and Gnome3 to our end user base at the same time is, not that systemd is in somekind of bad shape or not ( which it's not ). JBG -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
