On 09/13/2010 05:37 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 21:09 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote: >> You are correct on this. >> >> >> >> I found a bug lodged on it already for ghostscript: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630423 >> >> >> >> I feel this should be listed as F14Blocker – as in its current state, >> ghostscript is completely broken… > > Mostly I'd agree, but note that the broken package is only in > updates-testing and is getting inundated with negative karma: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghostscript-8.71-15.fc14 > > so our system is working nicely. This package is not in dist-f14 and > with that kind of karma would never get into dist-f14, so it's not > actually blocking the release at present. Good point. I'm just getting used to how this all works again after not doing testing since around RHL9. Theres a lot more systems in place now than there used to be! Is there a wiki or document somewhere that explains how packages progress from fix or issue to release? It seems I have some reading to do :) -- Steven Haigh Email: netwiz@xxxxxxxxx Web: http://www.crc.id.au Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897 Fax: (03) 8338 0299 -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
