Re: Release criteria proposal: fedora release artwork

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 12:06 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 16:18 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 09:49 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > > Greetings gang,
> > > 
> > > From the last 2 F14 blocker bug meetings [1], it became apparent that we
> > > need release criteria to describe how best to prioritize issues related
> > > to Fedora release artwork.  I took an action item to draft up 2 criteria
> > > to describe the expectations around release artwork before Final, and
> > > for the Final release.  
> > > 
> > > I'd like to propose the following criteria.  As always, comments welcome
> > > and encouraged.
> > > 
> > > = Fedora 14 Alpha =
> > >  * The default Fedora artwork used must either refer to the current
> > > Fedora release under development (Fedora 14), or reference an interim
> > > release milestone (e.g. Alpha or Beta).  If a release version number is
> > 
> > This should just say 'Alpha'. There's no situation in which it would be
> > okay for the Alpha to say it's the Beta. =)
> 
> I was trying to capture the scenario mizmo described where the
> design-team would have milestone specific artwork for the Alpha and
> Beta, instead of general development release artwork.  For example, it
> might have the words, "Alpha" or "Beta" in the artwork.

Oh, I see, that makes sense.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux