On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 12:06 -0400, James Laska wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 16:18 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 09:49 -0400, James Laska wrote: > > > Greetings gang, > > > > > > From the last 2 F14 blocker bug meetings [1], it became apparent that we > > > need release criteria to describe how best to prioritize issues related > > > to Fedora release artwork. I took an action item to draft up 2 criteria > > > to describe the expectations around release artwork before Final, and > > > for the Final release. > > > > > > I'd like to propose the following criteria. As always, comments welcome > > > and encouraged. > > > > > > = Fedora 14 Alpha = > > > * The default Fedora artwork used must either refer to the current > > > Fedora release under development (Fedora 14), or reference an interim > > > release milestone (e.g. Alpha or Beta). If a release version number is > > > > This should just say 'Alpha'. There's no situation in which it would be > > okay for the Alpha to say it's the Beta. =) > > I was trying to capture the scenario mizmo described where the > design-team would have milestone specific artwork for the Alpha and > Beta, instead of general development release artwork. For example, it > might have the words, "Alpha" or "Beta" in the artwork. Oh, I see, that makes sense. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
