On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Rodd Clarkson <rodd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 11:00 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Why was kernel-2.6.34.x pushed to updates in f13 when three people had >> > reported suspend issues with the kernel and no attempt was made to >> > address these issues. >> > >> > see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615560 >> > >> > I >> > Rodd >> >> Because there are always suspend issues, kernel team doesn't consider >> suspend problems a blocker for release. > > Sure, my problem lies not it that fact that there are suspend issues, but in > that no attempt was even made to address the suspend issues. > > My system suspends and resumes fine on f13 with the 2.6.33 kernels, so it > isn't unreasonable to expect this functionality to continue on a stable > release. On the other hand the 2.6.34 kernel has made my F-13 laptop 100% more usable than the entire release. I've been having massive issues and I've been actually meaning to reinstall F-12 but haven't actually had the time to do so. It got pushed from updates-testing to updates very quickly because a lot of people tested it before it even hit updates-testing and hence got the karma required to go through to updates very quickly. Peter -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
