On 09/01/2010 09:12 PM, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Adam
Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 11:00 +1000, Rodd
Clarkson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Why was kernel-2.6.34.x pushed to updates in f13 when
three people had
> reported suspend issues with the kernel and no
attempt was made to
> address these issues.
>
> see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615560
>
> I
> Rodd
Because there are always suspend issues, kernel team doesn't
consider
suspend problems a blocker for release.
Sure, my problem lies not it that fact that there are suspend
issues, but in that no attempt was even made to address the
suspend issues.
My system suspends and resumes fine on f13 with the 2.6.33
kernels, so it isn't unreasonable to expect this functionality
to continue on a stable release.
It is however, perfectly reasonable to expect that having
tried a kernel at the request of a fedora developer on
fedora-test-list and then having filed a bug against said
kernel reporting problems, that someone might actually have a
few minutes required to actually ask a few more questions and
try and address the problem.
Otherwise, why did they ask for feedback if it was just to be
ignored?
Rodd
Updating to this kernel stops my F13
system from booting. I have had to revert to the former kernel.
I have tried it each day it is offered as an update with the same
result all three times.
If I can provide any particular useful information, let me know.
Gerry Tool
|
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
