On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 12:21 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Michael Schwendt (mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > Untagging them from updates-testing and removing them from the repo > > way before they appear in the updates repo instead, is bad. It also > > causes broken dependencies temporarily. Those make testing less fun > > and lead to confusion when spending karma in bodhi. > > At the moment, we 'solve' this by doing update pushes in a certain > order such that this should not happen. (Basically, any number of > testing pushes, then a stable push, then the branched tree.) In order to avoid packages temporarily disappearing, the stable push should happen before the testing push, right? Am I missing something? > Now, if you have mirrors mirroring updates-testing and the branched > tree on a different schedule, then this may not work. But that's a > bit beyond our control. You could leave packages in updates-testing for a few days after they are added to updates, as Michael suggested. -- Matt -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
