#116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Reporter: adamwill | Owner: rhe Type: defect | Status: reopened Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Wiki | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Comment (by jlaska): When originally drafted long ago, the intent for the criteria (and test case) was to ensure that *no* conflicts/dependency dialog is presented to the user for any packages that they can install from media. Dependencies and conflicts (pkg and file) used to be non-recoverable events during installation. That is no longer the case. However, I do think it's important to the user experience that the user should not be prompted for packaging/mash/pungi for content on the media kit. As I understand it, even if packages are setup with proper a %conflicts:tag, they still conflict and will prompt the user for feedback if 2 conflicting packages are included in a transaction. The case with upstart and systemd is special in that they are not selectable during package selection, but are available during kickstart. Are we now comfortable with allowing a prompt for package conflicts on the media for certain types of conflicts? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/116#comment:9> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
