#116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Reporter: adamwill | Owner: rhe Type: defect | Status: reopened Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Wiki | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Changes (by adamwill): * cc: jlaska (added) Comment: I think we could stand to re-assess the desired behaviour here. Rui, James - are you aware of exactly how the installer behaves in all conflicting package cases? We have a few things to establish here: * What does anaconda do if packages within any of the pre-defined install groups have undeclared file conflicts? * What does anaconda do if packages within any of the pre-defined install groups have declared conflicts (Conflicts: tags) * What does anaconda do if you manually select conflicting packages in the package selection interface - both declared and undeclared cases? I think we should have the answers to those questions before deciding exactly what our criteria for conflicting packages on the media ought to be... -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/116#comment:4> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test