|
I vote yes to both Beta and Alpha proposals. > Subject: Release criteria proposal: boot to console > From: awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx > To: test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:19:30 -0700 > > Hi, folks. Quite a lot of release criteria proposals came out of today's > go/no-go meeting. I'll propose them formally for discussion and addition > to the official criteria here. > > First off, we are missing criteria for booting to *console* rather than > graphical desktop. This is important for e.g. minimal installs. > > Proposal: two criteria. Alpha: > > "When booting a system installed without a graphical environment, or > when using a correct configuration setting to cause an installed system > to boot in non-graphical mode, the system should boot to a state where > it is possible to log in through at least one of the default virtual > consoles." > > Beta: > > "When booting a system installed without a graphical environment, or > when using a correct configuration setting to cause an installed system > to boot in non-graphical mode, the system should provide a working login > prompt without any user intervention (aside from the firstboot utility) > when boot is complete, and all virtual consoles intended to provide a > working login prompt should do so." > > These read a bit icky to me, clarification / rephrasing would be > welcome. The key point here is that it was quite widely agreed at the > go/no-go meeting that we should *not* block an Alpha release if tty1 > doesn't work, as long as one of the other ttys works fine so you can log > in properly just by doing ctrl-alt-f2 or whatever. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > test mailing list > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test |
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
