----- "Andre Robatino" <robatino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I removed the specific examples (which also has the advantage of one > less thing > to have to update periodically). When I look at it know, I must say the examples were quite handy. I would put there at least one example. Probably right under bullet 1 in How to test. It simplifies thinking a bit :) > I'd also like to put in exact byte > size numbers > for the lower limits as well, for consistency. As I understand it, the > exact > values aren't critical. Should it say 2 MB = 2,000,000 bytes, or 2 MiB > = > 2,097,152 bytes? Depends on the example, but I would maybe stick to the default output of ls -s, therefore IEC units. If all the numbers are in IEC units then one example is enough. > > Ideally, I don't think there should be a lower size limit at all, but > a separate > test to detect directly whatever fault would cause such small images. I also think the lower size limit is quite artificial and doesn't have to be specified. If the image is broken and too small, it fail some other test (probably boot test). I would remove lower size limit check completely, another step for simpler test cases. > > Should the upper size limit for all the Live media be 1 GB, or should > it be > CD-size for some of them, and 1 GB for the rest? AFAIK we have only one live image media, right? And that is supposed to be sized under 1 GB. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
