On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 09:25 -0400, James Laska wrote: > > Sounds good to me and seems like others share the opinion, I will > > update the wiki today to reflect the change as well as add the step > > for applying to FAS in the table as fenris02 pointed out to me that it > > appears to be missing. > > Thanks for initiating this topic Adam. I don't have strong opinions > here, but I could see your option#2 being used in the event (hopefully > unlikely) that we need to provide a more consistent screening process > for proventesters. What you guys have both established seems like a > good first-time process, light-weight ... not too many > rules/restrictions. #2 seems like a reasonable mechanism to use in the case that we consider *removing* someone's proventester privileges, actually. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
