Hearing no objections, I updated the language at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/StockBugzillaResponses#No_Debugging_Symbols -B. On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 16:19 -0400, Christopher Beland wrote: > It looks like things have gone a bit awry with this triage: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575030 > > ABRT's automatically reported backtrace didn't include debugging > symbols, but the triager used the stock message here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/StockBugzillaResponses#No_Stack_Trace > > I was going to change that stock response to advise triagers that they > should not use it in the case of automatically generated backtraces from > ABRT. ABRT should have installed the required debuginfo packages > automatically, and the fact that it didn't means there's a bug in ABRT > (or a supporting package). > > I'm thinking the right thing for the triager to do is to apologize for > the system not collecting enough information to diagnose the crash, and > assign the bug to ABRT (or the appropriate supporting package) so that > future crashes can be diagnosed properly. Does that sound reasonable? > > -B. > -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
