On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 22:22 +0000, Andre Robatino wrote: > Actually, zsync would be a better choice than rsync, since its efficiency should > be identical in the same situations, but unlike rsync, it puts the CPU burden on > the client instead of the server. Unfortunately, it's not available for Fedora > yet (at least in the standard repos). So I guess the questions are, how long > before zsync is available, and would the server be capable of running rsync > until then? zsync is still stuck on the no-bundled-libraries problem, there's been no progress since the last time we talked about it AFAIK. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
