On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 00:12:00 -0500, > Adam Miller <maxamillion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hello all, >> I previously wrote a page called "Join Critical Path Wranglers >> Draft" and it has since been moved and edited. Its name has changed >> because of the new FAS group called provenpackagers has been made and >> will be in charge of the critical path QA. > > Are there going to be multiple paths to getting in the provenpackager > group? Currently the path to that seems to be as a packager and applying > to FESCO. This new path seems to be through the QA group. Will both paths > remain or will just the new one exist. > >> This is still a draft, but I think its quite a bit closer to >> finalization than the previous version. I'm wide open to questions, >> comments, and snide remarks. > > Being in the packager group isn't listed as a prerequisite. Accesswise, that > will probably work, but it would seem to be odd to become a provenpackager > without already being a packager. > WOW epic oversight on my part .... that's supposed to be "proventester" and not "provenpackager." ProvenTester will be a new FAS group that will be responsible for adding karma to critical path packages. New version: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/JoinProvenTesters:Draft Very sorry for the confusion. I was just typing away .... apologies. -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
