As always, IRC transcript and details available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20100315 = Attendees = People present (lines said) * jlaska (109) * adamw (45) * kparal (22) * daumas (5) * zodbot (4) * Viking-Ice (4) Regrets: * [[User:liam]] * [[User:rhe]] * [[User:wwoods]] * [[User:jskladan]] = Agenda = * [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-March/089190.html Proposed meeting agenda] * [http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-03-15/fedora-qa.2010-03-15-16.00.html MeetBot summary] == Previous meeting follow-up == 1. maxamillion seeking input from the [[Mentors]] group for guidance on mentor responsibilities 2. continued testing of bug#567346 to further isolate the failure conditions * This issue is being tracked as a F13Beta blocker, see [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-March/089140.html blocker meeting recap] 3. jlaska - update [[AutoQA_PatchProcess]] to include fedorapeople.org git repo * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoQA_PatchProcess#Private_Branch == Fedora 13 test status == Upcoming test milestones: * Pre-beta acceptance test - awaiting new anaconda build before sending through AutoQA - https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3495 * 2010-03-18 - Beta test compose * 2010-03-18 - Palimpsest & udisk improvements Test Day * 2010-03-19 - F13Beta blocker review #2 == proventesters == Jlaska asked the group what tasks remain in order to move forward on defining the ''proventesters'' group and workflow. * Adam noted that Jkeating may be working several tasks on this front. * Jlaska directed those interested in defining providetesters, to provide feedback to maxamillion's [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-March/088980.html email]. == Privilege Escalation test == Adamw reminded the group that we've not yet defined test cases to validate the recently approved [[Privilege_escalation_policy]]. * Adamw felt the first step is to come up with the script to identify privesc-relevant packages. * Kparal asked whether these would be automated tests, or tests more like the desktop validation plan. Discussion followed on the appropriate place to automate these * The group discussed candidate packages to inspect for polkit changes, including polkit configs, setuid binaries, certain d-bus config files, consolehelper files and pam configs. * Adam took action to discuss a privileged package detection script with wwoods == Open discussion - <Your topic here> == === Update Policy Proposals === Kparal clarified that current package update proposals require that deps/conflicts tests occur whenever a package enters ''updates'' '''and''' ''updates-testing''. Kparal also discussed concerns around AutoQA being a bottleneck for packages. === AutoQA packaging === Adamw asked how AutoQA packaging was progressing. * Jlaska noted that packaging wasn't moving, and that a FAD is being planned to help work down the list of java %buildrequires. More information will be sent to [mailto:java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] later in the week. = Action items = # adamw to check-in with wwoods on tooling needs for priv esc. test
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
