Re: [Fedora Update] [CRITPATH] [comment] libselinux-2.0.90-5.fc13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:34:06 +0000, updates fedoraproject org wrote:

> The following comment has been added to the libselinux-2.0.90-5.fc13 update:
> 
> bodhi - 2010-03-04 01:34:06 (karma: 0)
> This update has been pushed to stable
> 
> To reply to this comment, please visit the URL at the bottom of this mail
> 
> ================================================================================
>      libselinux-2.0.90-5.fc13
> ================================================================================
>   Update ID: FEDORA-2010-2698
>     Release: Fedora 13
>      Status: stable
>        Type: bugfix
>       Karma: 3
>     Request: stable
>       Notes: Fixed doublefree if selinux is disabled.  Was not intentional to
>            : get everyone to boot with SELinux enabled :^).
>   Submitter: dwalsh
>   Submitted: 2010-02-18 15:29:13
>    Comments: dwalsh - 2010-02-18 15:29:13 (karma 0)
>              This update has been submitted for testing
> 
>              bochecha - 2010-02-21 22:36:04 (karma 0)
>              It's been unpushed for F12 because apparently it
>              breaks everything, shouldn't it be unpushed for F13 as
>              well ?
> 
>              mschwendt - 2010-02-23 11:51:07 (karma -1)
>              [ bochecha: -4.fc12 was unpushed, and the update
>              request was edited to push -5.fc12 instead. ]
>              -5.fc13 here crashed, too, when I downloaded it from
>              koji to fix F13 that got updated to -4.fc13. I went
>              back to -3.fc13 and am running yum-complete-
>              transaction now prior to reparing the damage and
>              another test.
> 
>              mschwendt - 2010-02-23 11:55:40 (karma 1)
>              -5.fc13 doesn't crash.
> 
>              dwalsh - 2010-02-23 14:31:23 (karma 0)
>              This update has been submitted for testing
> 
>              bodhi - 2010-02-23 16:10:13 (karma 0)
>              This update has been pushed to testing
> 
>              adamwill - 2010-02-24 19:31:01 (karma 1)
>              works fine here, as with my comments on selinux-
>              policy; can't cause any double- frees with any selinux
>              configuration.
> 
>              jkeating (cvsadmin) - 2010-02-26 02:57:00 (karma 1)
>              Works fine for me.
> 
>              bodhi (cvsadmin) - 2010-02-26 02:57:00 (karma 0)
>              Critical path update approved
> 
>              bodhi - 2010-02-26 11:47:57 (karma 0)
>              This update has been pushed to stable
> 
>              bodhi - 2010-02-27 03:41:52 (karma 0)
>              This update has been pushed to stable
> 
>              bodhi - 2010-02-27 13:01:37 (karma 0)
>              This update has been pushed to stable
> 
>              bodhi - 2010-02-28 14:45:20 (karma 0)
>              This update has been pushed to stable
> 
>              bodhi - 2010-03-01 01:38:37 (karma 0)
>              This update has been pushed to stable
> 
>              bodhi - 2010-03-02 00:51:44 (karma 0)
>              This update has been pushed to stable
> 
>              bodhi - 2010-03-03 01:56:13 (karma 0)
>              This update has been pushed to stable
> 
>              bodhi - 2010-03-03 08:17:39 (karma 0)
>              This update has been pushed to stable
> 
>              bodhi - 2010-03-04 00:20:47 (karma 0)
>              This update has been pushed to stable
> 
>              bodhi - 2010-03-04 01:34:06 (karma 0)
>              This update has been pushed to stable
> 
>   http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F13/FEDORA-2010-2698

Something seems to be stuck here. How often will it be pushed to
stable again together with a notification email?
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux