On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 19:34 -0500, Richard Ryniker wrote: > On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 15:51 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > >> Which version of anaconda is in the liveinst? I have seen this same > >> behavior with the liveinst and the install DVDs, but, for the install > >> DVDs the problem was fixed. Anaconda in F13 Alpha RC4 is 13.32 and it > >> detects VGs and LVs. > >> > >Indeed, there's 13.27 even though it's yesterday's snapshot... I'll try > >to update the anaconda and see if it helps. > > Indeed, > > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/logs/20100227.20-x86_64.log > > clearly indicates anaconda 13.27 was used: > > Retrieving http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/13/x86_64/os/Packages/anaconda-13.26-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm ...OK > > It would appear something is broken in the nightly build process, when > anaconda 13.31 is already in the (updates-testing) repository with a date > of February 24. > > I should think the primary purpose of the nightly build is to incorporate > the latest software, but we may learn more from the people directly > involved with this process. There's nothing wrong with it exactly. The nightlies build from dist-f13, they do not use updates-testing. This is intentional. It's somewhat inconsistent given that updates-testing is enabled as a repository by default, but it's how it's been designed to work, so far. The RC builds used some packages from updates-testing or Koji via a side repo Jesse set up for the purpose, once the RC rush calmed down a bit we got all those changes moved into dist-f13, though. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
