On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:31 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote: > On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 19:34 -0500, Richard Ryniker wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 15:51 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > > >> Which version of anaconda is in the liveinst? I have seen this same > > >> behavior with the liveinst and the install DVDs, but, for the install > > >> DVDs the problem was fixed. Anaconda in F13 Alpha RC4 is 13.32 and it > > >> detects VGs and LVs. > > >> > > >Indeed, there's 13.27 even though it's yesterday's snapshot... I'll try > > >to update the anaconda and see if it helps. > > > > Indeed, > > > > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/logs/20100227.20-x86_64.log > > > > clearly indicates anaconda 13.27 was used: > > > > Retrieving http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/13/x86_64/os/Packages/anaconda-13.26-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm ...OK > > > > It would appear something is broken in the nightly build process, when > > anaconda 13.31 is already in the (updates-testing) repository with a date > > of February 24. > > > > I should think the primary purpose of the nightly build is to incorporate > > the latest software, but we may learn more from the people directly > > involved with this process. > > > > > > Well, as I outlined in the previous mail, I tried updating it (on the > Live DVD) to 13.32, but it didn't help. So I d/l-ed install DVD of Alpha > RC4 and after some minor difficulties the install went fine (btw. it > takes ages to install from install media, I already forgot how tedious > the wait is, especially compared to install from Live Media). I filed a bug related to *only* the live installer not recognizing previous logical volumes. I think this captures your experience. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568460 Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
