On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:10:14 -0500 (EST), Paul wrote: > On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > >>> Subject: Broken dependencies with Fedora 12 + updates-testing - 2010-02-27 > >>> > >>> The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies: > >>> > >>> ====================================================================== > >>> The results in this summary consider Test Updates! > >>> ====================================================================== > >>> > >>> package: autotrust-0.3.1-2.fc12.i686 from fedora-12-i386 > >>> unresolved deps: > >>> libunbound.so.1 > >> > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/autotrust-0.3.1-3.fc12 > >> > >> I fired of a rebuild. Did I need to request an ABI change as well? > > > > Of course! > > Just to clarify, autotrust had no abi change, just unbound. Which I did > request an abi change for a while ago? Why do you ask me? With "request an ABI change" I thought you refer to requesting a koji buildroot override tag. Is that assumption correct? > >> I requested update to testing, not stable. Not sure if that is the > >> right thing for a simple rebuild. > > > > It is not the right thing. You ought to have noticed that > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unbound-1.4.1-2.fc12 > > is ABI-incompatible because of a SONAME change. > > And you cannot rebuild anything against that new library as long > > as it is not a stable update that would be included in the koji > > buildroot installations. > > Isn't this a catch22? autotrust will break as soon as unbound gets into > stable, while unbound is now waiting because it would break autotrust? The proper way is to file a ticket in Fedora Release Engineering's tracker and request a koji buildroot override tag for the new "unbound", then rebuild autotrust and release both in the same bodhi ticket at once. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
