On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 09:29 +0100, Adam Pribyl wrote: > Yesterdays update of my test machine brought it to Fedora 14, but I would > rather follow the F13 line. I understand the No_Frozen_Rawhide effort, but > did I miss the branch point to follow F13 instead moving further > with rawhide? > > BTW: Is it not too soon to call it Fedora 14? Would it not be better to > use at least in /etc/issue something like Rawhide or Fedora 13.90? I know > of a newbie users reporting me problems with Fedora in past - they enabled > the rawhide repo and were happily using Fedora <stable>+1. Now I can > imagine users comming and reporting even Fedora <stable>+2 issues, while > even <stable>+1 is not released. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_Frozen_Rawhide_Implementation -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY "Best lil town on Earth!" -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
