In the last QA meeting it was discussed that we needed some set of policies or guidelines for handling memberships to the QA FAS group for adding karma to the packages within the critical path of F13 (or Fedora CURRENT_RELEASE+1). I volunteered to draft up such a document in the wiki and I snagged a little bit of the wiki mark up from the Ambassadors join page as a template, so thanks to who ever authored that one. Some notes on my Draft, I thought of putting together policies but I don't entirely find this a policy style situation but I consider it a "case by case" basis just as the Proven Packager process is. Its essentially a "does this person do consistently good QA work?" situation that (in my opinion) should be under review by peers to decide their state of readiness to be responsible for karma that goes into the Critical Path packages. Ok, intro and disclaimer aside. Here's my proposal: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/JoinCriticalPathWranglers:Draft There are some details on the mentors concept that I think would need working out (denoted by the FIXME bit) that I assume can be worked on at the next QA meeting. Questions, comments, and snide remarks welcome! -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
